#FLICKR VERSUS PICASA ARCHIVE#
#FLICKR VERSUS PICASA FREE#

You can also more readily find friends, and create groups for pictures that anyone can add to. On the homepage, you view pics from your photo stream, as well as your friendsвЂ™ and then random people. With Flickr, I used their RSS feeds to bring in the 10 most recently upload photos and then 10 Random photos.ДЇlickr also does social networking better. When it came time for me to import the photos from Picasa onto my blog, I realized that I could only do it by album, which I wasnвЂ™t a huge fan of because adding my newest photos wasnвЂ™t automated. Because of this, you have a little more wiggle room with what you do with the photos. If youre interesting in learning about photography, or. You tag them and can add the to вЂSetsвЂ™ or вЂCollectionsвЂ™ if you choose. I believe the main difference between Picasas web albums and Flickr is the community aspect of things. Picasa, on the other hand enables its users to store 1GB images in all. Exist diferene n seturile de caracteristici pentru ambele servicii i modul n care au evoluat comunitile lor de utilizatori. Picasa Web Albums este un serviciu similar freemium de la Google.

#FLICKR VERSUS PICASA FREE#

Free-account holders can choose to share 200 MB of images every month, while the paid account holders are free to share unlimited amount of images. Flickr este cel mai popular serviciu de distribuire de fotografii cu peste 5 miliarde de imagini. With Flickr, you have a little more freedom with how you organize your photos because they arenвЂ™t automatically associated with an album like they are in Picasa. Flickr offers two options to its users- free account and paid account. With Flickr, you have a little more freedom with how you organize your photos because they arenвЂ™t automatically associated with an album like they are in. But once I got into Picasa, the interface wasnвЂ™t as good, nor was the organization of photos. In the question What are the best cloud photo storage and portfolio services. The transfer (from Flickr->Picasa and vise versa) was easy enough using iPhoto and RSS feeds. But once I got into Picasa, the interface wasnвЂ™t as good, nor was the organization of photos. When comparing SmugMug vs Flickr, the Slant community recommends SmugMug for most people.

#FLICKR VERSUS PICASA ARCHIVE#

But when you want to archive these pictures and store them on central place or burn them. The transfer (from Flickr->Picasa and vise versa) was easy enough using iPhoto and RSS feeds. Flickr and Picasa make it easy to share pictures taken at events. I found that with Picasa, strangely enough, I didnвЂ™t have as much freedom as I did with Flickr and when it came down to it, Flickr was a much better web app. For the last couple of months I decided to try out GoogleвЂ™s solution to online photo albums, Picasa.

Flickr versus picasa